Bongo Fury

kelv wrote:Which, isn't quite the same as making the system itself more robust.

It's been tried, unsuccessfully, by several people in the past - including moving the thermostat to the top hose.

<em>kelv</em> wrote:Anybody expert enough to volunteer ?

Why not try it yourself? - you seem to like taking risks

To slow John, beat ya to it

missfixit70 wrote:To slow John, beat ya to it

Yeah, but you've been refreshed by a holiday - my day will come

francophile1947 wrote:

kelv wrote:Which, isn't quite the same as making the system itself more robust.

It's been tried, unsuccessfully, by several people in the past - including moving the thermostat to the top hose.

<em>kelv</em> wrote:Anybody expert enough to volunteer ?

Why not try it yourself? - you seem to like taking risks

Whatever
Any useful, and genuine contributions to the debate continue to be welcomed.
Cheap pops are for sale at every Spar in the country

kelv wrote: Was that humour again ?
Or just a cheap snipe
Not particularly effective in taking the debate forwards either way was it.

Part one was fact - what's the problem?
Part two was a suggestion (with a bit of humour, hence the emoticon ) Others have failed to improve the system, so why not have a go yourself?

All my posts on this thread have been constructive (with the exception of the last reply to Kirsty) so why are you being so argumentative?

P.S. I note you've edited your post since I started to respond to it

Pot, kettle and black, spring to mind ..........


Back on topic anyone ......................

Don't fancy trying it myself thankyou.
Particulary as it has apparently been tried before and failed.
Why should that be considered a decent recommendation ?
Any sensible suggestions continue to be welcomed.

P.S. I note you've edited your post since I started to respond to it [/quote]


Should be quicker then

That's enough slagging each other off. Thread locked.