
I prepared this diagram showing the relative heights of the cooling system components just in case some clever person may spot something relevant.

I also have some interesting thoughts to share on the stat flow.
Moderators: Doone, westonwarrior
Should rear heater not lower Steve? it is below the rear floor level, I can't make out which is which on that diagram, eyes getting oldwiddowson2008 wrote:Ok - enough festivity for one year - back to business.![]()
I prepared this diagram showing the relative heights of the cooling system components just in case some clever person may spot something relevant.
I also have some interesting thoughts to share on the stat flow.
I think it's a valid theory, BUTwiddowson2008 wrote:Yet more ............. FLOW diagrams this time!!!!!
Stat @ 5mm lift - FULLY OPEN
These diagrams suggest that the ONLY flow which has an immediate effect on the wax cylinder (and hence stat lift) is that from the heater circuit.
Flows from cylinder head and radiator both seem to pass through the engine BEFORE seeing the wax.
Any thoughts out there??????
If you take a closer look Kirsty, the levels on the diagram are to the pipework and NOT the heaters. This is because I could actually SEE the pipes, and therefore take a physical dimension. The heaters on the other hand - not a clue where these are - wouldn't recognise one if I fell over it. I was rather hoping someone else would tell me.missfixit70 wrote:Should rear heater not lower Steve? it is below the rear floor level, I can't make out which is which on that diagram, eyes getting oldwiddowson2008 wrote:Ok - enough festivity for one year - back to business.![]()
I prepared this diagram showing the relative heights of the cooling system components just in case some clever person may spot something relevant.
I also have some interesting thoughts to share on the stat flow.but they both seem too high to be the rear heater.
If I've used the term (which I think I may have - the relevance of it came up in that article about Rover cooling system problems) it'll be to describe a stat. that is slow to express a critical change in temperature by responding with mechanical action. I've no idea what might cause it (increased frictional resistance of some sort maybe?), but it's effect is too put it out of phase with the demands of the system for greater or lesser flow at the moment it is needed. Again, this all came out of the Rover article and I wouldn't know just how critical that might be on a bog std Bongo engine - you'd think designers would be at pains to avoid that kind of susceptabilitywiddowson2008 wrote:Another question.
There have been a few posts lately refering to 'lazy stats'. Can someone define a 'lazy stat'?
Mechanically speaking, your thinking is my first port of call.mikeonb4c wrote:......... I've no idea what might cause it (increased frictional resistance of some sort maybe?), ........widdowson2008 wrote:Another question.
There have been a few posts lately refering to 'lazy stats'. Can someone define a 'lazy stat'?
I had wondered about loss of wax but not knowing the construction/design I hesitated to say. It has to be strong candidate as otherwise, hydraulic expansion and contraction are pretty effective at overcoming frictional forces.widdowson2008 wrote:Mechanically speaking, your thinking is my first port of call.mikeonb4c wrote:......... I've no idea what might cause it (increased frictional resistance of some sort maybe?), ........widdowson2008 wrote:Another question.
There have been a few posts lately refering to 'lazy stats'. Can someone define a 'lazy stat'?
Another possibility (relating to the initial stat lift) is gunge in the stat seating area which has a slight taper at the seat. (Sticky valve)
Yet another very real possibility is loss of the wax compound through the stem area of the valve. There is a specific amount of wax in a new stat, so if any is lost through leakage, the stat WILL behave in a sluggish manner - NO DOUBT ABOUT IT - SIMPLE HYDRAULICS.
All these things would affect the stat movement.
I would expect the original Mazda stat will be manufactured to a much higher specification than some of the replacements you can get, so when mine needs changing I will go for the real thing. May cost a bit more but I think the expense is well worth it - the alternative scenarios don't bear thinking about.
We started for a change with a Bongo with a "Good Coolant System" instead of trying to fix an overheating Bongo, we tried to remove heat from an untouched for 3 years plus Bongo with no oil or water leaks, original head and water pump etc,
Bongo A
1st Attempt
Mason alarm fitted
Good readings generally.
Actions:
New Blue Print Stat
New Intermotor Temperature Sensor Switch
New Blue Coolant
Speed Flush
New Gear Box Oil used millarmatic DM
Results Observed:
Slight but definate raised temperature according to gauge (suspect sender inaccurate) by could be copy stat. Ran for two weeks, but not happy as would have expected lower general readings.
Spoke to you reference Stat Operation with regard to disc at the top of the stat shutting off hot head water return.
2nd Attempt
Drop Coolant, not reused
Fitted New Mazda Temp Sender
Fitted New Mazda Fan Switch
Fitted New Mazda Stat
New Red Coolant fitted (Carplan)
CHECK STAT TOP HOUSING CLEAN – It was gasket face clean
Results Observed:
Tremendous difference, the control temperature is achieved and maintained easily (Stat control) at a lower temperature band well away from the fan level temp, and away from the danger level.
The auto box warms better and quicker therefore performs better with less heat generated which would need to be cooled by the rad.
Engine and Gearbox now working at correct temperature levels giving smoother results.
Conclusion:
The stat is key. To us the £7.00 copy or £15.00 Mazda, it has to be genuine.
Thermostat housing needs to be very clean to seal correctly
Mason or one of Haydns gauge modifying instructions would show up this in relation to narrow working or operating temperature band and if these temps stray either up or down then the stat/housing should be checked .
Bongo B
History:
New Ranger Cylinder Head fitted 2 Years ago
New Mazda Radiator, 2 Years
New Water Pump, Unknown Brand, 2 Years Ago
New Copy Stat, 2 Years ago
New Coolant, 2 Years ago
Garage Bill = £1800
Full Silicon Hose set fitted, 18 months ago
12 months satisfactory running.
Then bought a light weight Caravan, raised temps noted via Mason Alarm to excessive levels. In the last three months over the winter period symptoms getting steadily worse to the point where anything over ½ hour high speed motorway driving temperature would steadily increase and would not decrease until fan level is reached. It would maintain levels, not cool levels. Fans where then wired manually and water wetter was used to pull down excessive temperatures.
Transfer of Knowlege from Bongo A to Bongo B
New Mazda Stat fitted
Bongos A's Original Old Mazda Temperature Sender Fitted, cleaned up.
Bongo A's Original Old Mazda Fan Switch fitted
Stat housing Top Disc Port from Head found to be dirty and deposit build up particularly at the flow from heaters across the stat edge: See Pics
Removed and Cleaned as per pics.
New Mazda Housing/Engine Gasket fitted
Red Coolant (Carplan)
Result:
Result!!!!!!!
as per Bongo A
Final Point:
One final point of note is that in "my opinion" a used lazy stat, when pan tested to boiling point only gives a low or inaccurate reading the 1st time tested. On second test it will normally be "Re-awakened" to work apparently normally and test well against a new stat. "Very confusing"!!!!!!!
Do they become Bongo Bound??????