cheaper parts have been proven to be false ecconomy on several partswiddowson2008 wrote: Did you have another look at what was said? Personally, I can't see any ambiguity in there at all. Pattern parts are always a gamble because the original Mazda spec is somewhat 'relaxed'. Thermostat has just the same issues.
Bit like the difference between the real Corn Flakes and the Sainsbury 'look-alike'. That's why they are cheaper, and in this particular instance (fan switch) Ady did some tests and was in no doubt that there was a difference (in the samples he checked). I'm hoping he'll come on and clarify. Not trying to pick an arguement, just stating some facts.
drop links (lasted months instead of years)
oil filters (dropped oil all over drives)
glow plugs (lasted no time)
thermostats (as above)
gaskets (cost people a fortune to have the job done a second time)
heads (as above )
rads (have extra vents)
hoses (not cheaper either)
Quite right to flag up that there is a risk with compatable parts.
They probably will do the job perfectly but there is allways a risk.
As much as I am a tight git I won't skimp again on parts that may not last and have to be replaced




